Louisville and Georgia Tech will face off on Friday Night at Cardinal Stadium.  GT scores points and possesses the ball, but the Yellowjacket defense and special teams leaves something to be desired.  Louisville on the other hand made noticeable improvement from Week 4 to Week 5 but has still lost two games in a row.

Here is how the two teams stack up:

130 teams in College Football
Louisville Georgia Tech
Strength of Schedule (Sagarin) 42nd 82nd
Scoring Offense (ppg) 18.4 (122nd) 36.4 (38th)
Total Offense (ypg) 311.6 (121st) 453.2 (42nd)
Passing Offense (ypg) 191.6 (102nd) 114.0 (125th)
Rushing Offense (ypg) 120.00 (113th) 339.20 (2nd)
Scoring Defense (ppg) 26.0 (71st) 27.8 (82nd)
Total Defense (ypg) 385.8 (75th) 356.0 (51st)
Passing Defense (ypg) 217.0 (62nd) 207.0 (51st)
Rushing Defense (ypg) 168.8 (83rd) 149.00 (57th)
Punt Returns (ypr) 16.44 (21st) 8.5 (72nd)
Kickoff Returns (ypr) 20.00 (77th) 19.33 (84th)
Opponent Punt Returns (ypr) 10.69 (90th) 10.67 (89th)
Opponent Kickoff Return (ypr) 19.93 (57th) 30.60 (126th)
Punting (ypp) 42.77 (41st) 44.93 (17th)
Field Goal % 100% (1st) 25.00% (130th)
Opponent FG % 50.0% (19th) 100% (130th)
First Downs (per game) 18.6 (105th) 22.4 (60th)
Opponent First Downs (per game) 19.0 (54th) 20.8 (79th)
Penalties (ypg) 67.0 (90th) 44.8 (26th)
Turnover Margin (season) -7 (129th) 1 (51st)
Time of Possession 28:48.00 (86th) 32:23.20 (23rd)
Sacks (Per Game) 1.2 (112th) 1.2 (112th)
Tackles for Loss (Per Game) 4.20 (117th) 3.8 (119th)
Sacks Allowed (Per Game) 3.00 (105th) 1.4 (34th)
Tackles for Loss Allowed (Per Game) 7.4 (106th) 5.2 (39th)
Interceptions Gained (season) 2 (99th) 7 (11th)
Passes Defended (per game) 2.6 (118th) 4.2 (71st)
Fumbles Recovered (season) 2 (79th) 3 (56th)
Fumbles Forced (season) 2 (94th) 4 (49th)
Fumbles Lost (season) 3 (57th) 5 (107th)
Interceptions Lost (Season) 8 (126th) 4 (70th)
Kick/Punts Blocked (season) 1 (30th)
3rd Down Conversion % 35.82% (99th) 38.98% (75th)
4th Down Conversion % 28.57% (116th) 54.55% (65th)
Opponent 3rd Down Conversion % 44.87% (114th) 46.77% (120th)
Opponent 4th Down Conversion % 60.00% (85th) 60.00% (85th)
Red Zone Conversion % 85.71% (58th) 78.26% (105th)
Red Zone TD Conversion % 64.29% (70th) 73.91% (35th)
Red Zone Trips 14 (99th) 23 (18th)
Opponent Red Zone Conversion % 76.47% (45th) 86.67% (83rd)
Opponent Red Zone TD Conversion % 58.82% (61st) 73.33% (105th)
Opponent Red Zone Trips 17 (76th) 15 (62nd)
Kickoffs (ypk) 59.71% (101st) 60.00% (96th)
Plays 324 (75th) 338 (52nd)
Yards Per Play 4.81 (115th) 6.7 (19th)
Plays +10 Yards 63 (84th) 73 (45th)
Plays +20 Yards 16 (104th) 33 (13th)
Plays +30 Yards 7 (100th) 15 (18th)
Plays +40 Yards 3 (104th) 7 (27th)
Opponent Plays +10 Yards 61 (61st) 61 (61st)
Opponent Plays +20 Yards 21 (69th) 14 (19th)
Opponent Plays +30 Yards 10 (71st) 6 (18th)
Opponent Plays +40 Yards 4 (39th) 2 (13th)
The following two tabs change content below.
@UofLSheriff50. Louisville native, University of Louisville Business School Grad c/o 2004. Co-Founder of TheCrunchZone.com

Latest posts by Mark Blankenbaker (see all)

TCZ Comments

comments